Delhi: India’s star batsman Virat Kohli scored his first century in the Champions Trophy on 23 February. He played an important role in India’s victory and brought the team to the target in the 43rd over itself. Pakistan bowlers tried their best at Dubai International Cricket Stadium, but could not dismiss Kohli. However, during the match, there came a chance when Pakistan could appeal for ‘Obstructing the Field’.
What was the reason for the dispute?
In the 21st over of Run Chase, Kohli took a run off Haris Rauf. The throw on the non-strayer end was not straight, which Kohli stopped from his gloves. Kohli’s intention was not to disrupt the game as he had completed runs, but Pakistan could appeal according to the rules.
During the commentary, Sunil Gavaskar said, “No one was in backup. The fielder (Babar Azam) standing on the midwicket would have to dive, but Kohli did not need to stop the ball. He was lucky that Pakistan did not appeal. “
To this, former Pakistan cricketer and commentator Rameez Raja also reacted, saying, “And I was praising his game awareness!”
If Pakistan had appealed and Kohli had been out, it could have become a big controversy. At that time, Shreyas Iyer was a new batsman and this could increase the pressure on India.
What does the rule say?
- According to Rule 37.1.1, if a batsman deliberately disrupts the fielding side, he can be given ‘Obstructing the Field’ out.
- Rule 37.1.2 also says that if the batsman touches the ball by hand without the bat while playing the bowler, he can be given out.
Kohli completed his century on the last ball of the 43rd over and remained unbeaten by scoring 100 runs in 111 balls. India won this match by 6 wickets.
Related news
(Tagstotranslate) ICC champions trophy 2025