Delhi: The ICC has created some new playing conditions in all three formats, for international cricket. Generally it happens that the new playing conditions first bring into domestic cricket (it can start from any country) and with its experience, making necessary changes, implements them in international cricket.
ICC starts with international cricket
This time the ICC has started with international cricket and now the boards in cricket playing countries will implement them in domestic cricket. One of these is a special change in the conversion-sabstute protocol in all three formats in international cricket.
Which player will be used as Concisition-Society
According to the new protocol, now before the match starts, not only will you have to tell which player can be used as a conversion-subject, his role in the game will also have to be mentioned. Therefore, a wicketkeeper, a batsman, a seam bowler, a spin bowler and an all -rounder, will have to be nominated, clarifying his role.
Conversion-Society nomination
It was so far that according to the current law, the teams were taking approval from the match referee by nominating a player like a player in the game, in place of his role in the game, replacing him with a player. The day when this happened, the discussion also went on simultaneously that the teams have chosen the same instead of choosing the same skills as the right player, which could prove to be more beneficial in the current need.
Concisition-Society Law
In other words, it can be said that the Consulting-Society’s law has taken care of the law, but such stories remained only a mild discussion. Even on some occasions, it was alleged that deliberately called the player with a more essential skill with the pretext of a big head injury. Two major popular controversies:* In 2020, when India made Yuzvendra Chahal a concentration-subjects in place of all-rounder Ravindra Jadeja, Australia coach Justin did not consider it right.
Mehdi Hasan Miraj to Concurrent-Society
In 2019, Bangladesh replaced Spinner Mehdi Hasan Miraj, expert in Test against India as a conversion-police, in place of wicketkeeper-batsman Litton Das. Since Litton would not have bowled further if he had played further, he also made Mehdi from bowling, made of equal skill.
India-England T20 International
However, in January this year, in Pune, during the fourth Indo-England T20 International, India called Specialist Pesar Harshit Rana in place of all-rounder Shivam Dubey as a conversion substitute (with the approval of the match referee). Dubey is counted by batsman-all-rounder, but in international cricket, the captain does not give his bowling more than ‘improvised’. He scored 53 runs in India’s innings and coincidentally, in the last over, Jamie overson continued to play despite the bouncer helmet.
T20 International Debut
Harshit Rana came as his Convention Substitute and made his T20 International debut. England captain Jose Butler did not like this decision, Kevin Pietersen also said the same in the commentary but India had the approval of the match referee, so his objection was of no use.
Where were the players with a Skill?
Dubey threw only 9 overs in his last 12 T20 Internationals, while Rana had scored 2 runs in T20 cricket before that. In this way, where were the two players with the same skills? Rana himself proved this in the same match and took 3 wickets for 55 runs in 4 overs and played a special role in India’s victory.
Referee saved himself by giving this clarification
The match referee saved himself by giving himself that it should be seen that what would the injured player do in the match left? Since the role of fielding and bowling was left for Dubey, Rana was considered as ‘like him’ and India got the benefit of this consultation. Well, that match was done, but the British media wrote fiercely on this issue and tried to prove that India did not choose a player with ‘goods skill’ as a conversion substitute.
Now the ICC has made a lesson from this story, has made a new playing condition and the player who gets hurt will be a conversion subsidy. In some special circumstances, match referee can concessive in this playing condition and can also make a conversion substitute to players outside the list but will have to clarify its need. Now this time will tell whether this change will end the controversy?
Related news
(Tagstotranslate) Concussion Substitute Rule (T) Eng vs Ind (T) ICC